Forums
by
Luis Ca??as D??az
—
published on
Feb 15, 2009
EUPL community forums are focused on F/OSS licensing: the EUPL v1.1 and other licenses (no exclusive). Forums are open to all (lawyers, developers, project leaders, any other stakeholder). Provide the question is relevant to our focus and fairly presented, there will be no taboo.
EUPL v.1.1 - Provisions and comments
| Forum name | Conversations | Most recent comment |
|---|---|---|
| EUPL v.1.1 EUPL v.1.1 was approved by the European Commission on 9 January 2009. This discussion forum focuses on text and its modifications | 3 |
by Ismael Olea
January 21. 2010
|
EU and Member states policies
| Forum name | Conversations | Most recent comment |
|---|---|---|
| EU and MS policies Are EU and Member States policies explicit or directive enough when recomending F/OS software in case of acquisition or distribution of software? Discussion on recent policies and quidelines as published by competent authorities. | 2 |
by Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz
February 25. 2009
|
Compatibility between licences
| Forum name | Conversations | Most recent comment |
|---|---|---|
| EUPL and GPLv3 The EUPL has a unique compatibility list. GPLv3 is currently not in. What about including the GPLv3, the LGPLv3 and/or the Affero GPLv3 in the EUPL compatibility list? | 2 |
by Ho Thi Ngoc Tu
October 19. 2009
|
Producing derivative licences
| Forum name | Conversations | Most recent comment |
|---|---|---|
| Producing derivative licences from the EUPL? In several cases already, the OSOR.eu team has received request for using “parts” of the EUPL for elaborating other licenses. This is due to the fact the text is considered by many stakeholders as the most adapted to the European Context (legal solidity and linguistic versions). How far is this possible? | 2 |
by Pedro A. Gonz??lez P??rez
April 06. 2009
|
Powered by
Ploneboard

